How to Fight a GNETS Placement in Georgia: Step-by-Step Advocacy Guide

If your child's IEP team has proposed a GNETS placement in Georgia, you can challenge it — and you should ask the district to document its basis. The Georgia Network for Educational and Therapeutic Support was the subject of a Department of Justice lawsuit alleging illegal segregation of students with disabilities in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The lawsuit alleged that Georgia unnecessarily placed students in segregated GNETS facilities when they could have been served in less restrictive settings with appropriate behavioral supports.

This doesn't mean every GNETS program is automatically inappropriate. But it does mean the burden of proof should be on the district to demonstrate why your child cannot be served in the general education environment with supplementary aids and services — not on you to prove why your child should stay.

What GNETS Is and Why It's Controversial

GNETS is a statewide network of programs that serve students with emotional and behavioral disabilities in settings that are often separate from their home schools. Georgia operates 24 GNETS programs across the state.

The DOJ sued Georgia in 2016, alleging that the state:

• Unnecessarily segregated students with behavioral disabilities in GNETS facilities when they could be educated in their neighborhood schools
• Failed to provide adequate behavioral supports in general education settings before resorting to GNETS placements
• Maintained facilities that were often substandard — in some cases, students attended GNETS programs in repurposed buildings without adequate instructional resources
• Did not adequately plan for students to transition back to their home schools

The DOJ lawsuit alleged that Georgia violated Title II of the ADA by failing to serve students in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs — the foundational principle of the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) mandate under IDEA.

The Legal Basis for Challenging a GNETS Placement

You have multiple legal grounds to challenge a proposed GNETS placement:

IDEA's Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) requirement. Students with disabilities must be educated with nondisabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate. Removal from the general education environment can only occur when "the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily."

The "supplementary aids and services" test. Before the district can propose a more restrictive placement, they must demonstrate that they have tried — and documented the failure of — supplementary aids and services in the general education setting. This includes behavioral intervention plans (BIPs), 1:1 aides, modified schedules, counseling services, de-escalation protocols, and sensory supports. If the district hasn't exhausted these options, the GNETS proposal is premature.

The DOJ lawsuit as persuasive evidence. While the lawsuit's allegations aren't binding on individual IEP decisions, they identify a documented concern about unnecessary segregation in Georgia's GNETS system. Citing the lawsuit in your advocacy puts the district on notice that GNETS placements face heightened scrutiny.

Prior Written Notice requirements. Under Georgia Rule 160-4-7-.09, the district must provide written documentation explaining why they are proposing the GNETS placement, what alternatives they considered, what data supports the placement, and why they rejected less restrictive options. If the PWN is vague or missing, that's an immediate procedural violation.

Step-by-Step Advocacy Sequence

Step 1: Request Prior Written Notice Immediately

If the district is proposing a GNETS placement, send a written request for Prior Written Notice under Rule 160-4-7-.09. You want the district to document in writing:

• Why they believe the child cannot be served in the current setting
• What supplementary aids and services they have tried
• What data supports the need for a more restrictive placement
• What alternative placements they considered and why they rejected them

This forces the district to build the justification on paper rather than making the decision in a meeting through informal consensus.

Step 2: Demand a Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA)

If your child doesn't have a current FBA, request one immediately in writing. If there is an existing FBA, review it critically:

• Does it identify the function of the behavior (escape, attention, sensory, tangible)?
• Was it conducted by a qualified professional (BCBA or school psychologist with behavioral expertise)?
• Is the data current and representative of the present concern?

A GNETS placement based on behavioral concerns without a comprehensive, current FBA is procedurally vulnerable.

Step 3: Demand a Behavioral Intervention Plan (BIP)

An FBA should produce a BIP that addresses the identified behavioral functions with evidence-based strategies. Review whether:

• The current BIP matches the FBA findings
• The BIP has been consistently implemented (request implementation logs)
• The BIP has been revised based on data (if the first iteration isn't working, the response should be revising the plan, not changing the placement)

If the district cannot demonstrate that it implemented an appropriate BIP with fidelity before proposing GNETS, the record may not show that less restrictive supports were exhausted.

Step 4: Document What the District Has NOT Tried

Build a written record of the less restrictive supports the district has not attempted:

• 1:1 behavioral aide in the general education classroom
• Modified schedule (reduced class changes, extended transition times)
• Social skills instruction embedded in the school day
• Counseling services (individual or group)
• Sensory supports (sensory breaks, noise-canceling headphones, alternative seating)
• Check-in/check-out behavioral monitoring systems
• Restorative practice programs
• Telehealth behavioral consultation for staff

Each untried strategy is a question to raise about whether the district has exhausted less restrictive options.

Step 5: Request an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE)

If you disagree with the district's behavioral assessment that's driving the GNETS recommendation, you have the right to request an IEE at public expense. The independent evaluator can assess whether the district's data actually supports a more restrictive placement or whether appropriate behavioral supports in the general education setting could address the concerns.

Step 6: Send a Formal Placement Dispute Letter

If the IEP team proceeds with the GNETS recommendation over your objection, send a formal dispute letter that:

• Cites the LRE mandate under IDEA
• References the DOJ lawsuit allegations regarding unnecessary segregation in GNETS
• Lists the supplementary aids and services the district has not attempted
• Requests that the district justify the placement with specific data showing that the general education environment with additional supports has been tried and failed
• States your objection to the placement change and asks how to contest it under the applicable consent and stay-put rules

If the IEP team proceeds over your objection, ask promptly how the proposed change interacts with IDEA's stay-put and consent rules and whether due process is needed. Do not assume that a refusal alone resolves the dispute.

Step 7: Escalate if Necessary

If the district insists on the GNETS placement despite your objection:

• File a GaDOE state complaint citing LRE violations and inadequate supplementary aids and services
• Request mediation through GaDOE
• File for due process through OSAH if the district won't budge — placement disputes are exactly what due process hearings are designed to resolve

Who This Is For

• Parents whose Georgia IEP team has formally or informally proposed a GNETS placement
• Parents whose child is currently in a GNETS program and want to transition back to their neighborhood school
• Parents whose child has behavioral challenges and want to proactively establish LRE protections before GNETS is mentioned
• Advocates preparing a case against an unnecessary restrictive placement

Who This Is NOT For

• Parents who have independently evaluated GNETS programs and believe the specific program is the right fit for their child's needs
• Parents whose child has already been in a GNETS program with documented positive outcomes and appropriate transition planning
• Parents outside Georgia (other states have different behavioral placement structures)

The Toolkit That Walks You Through This

The Georgia IEP & 504 Advocacy Playbook includes a dedicated GNETS Defense chapter with every letter template, FBA demand script, BIP review checklist, and formal dispute letter referenced above — each citing exact Georgia SBOE Rules and O.C.G.A. sections. It also includes a DOJ lawsuit summary on a single-page reference card you can bring to the IEP meeting.

When the district mentions GNETS, you need to respond immediately with legally precise language. The Playbook gives you that language before you need it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the district force a GNETS placement if I refuse?

A proposed change to an existing placement can be contested through due process, but whether the child stays in the current placement depends on the procedural posture and the applicable consent and stay-put rules. Ask promptly for the district's position in writing and seek procedural advice rather than relying on a refusal alone.

Is every GNETS program problematic?

Not necessarily. Some GNETS programs have improved since the DOJ lawsuit, and some students genuinely benefit from smaller, specialized behavioral settings. The issue is whether the placement is necessary — whether the district has exhausted less restrictive options first. The lawsuit alleged that Georgia systemically failed to try adequate supports before resorting to GNETS, not that GNETS programs are inherently harmful in every case.

What if the district says they've tried everything?

Ask for documentation. Specifically: the FBA, the BIP, implementation fidelity data, behavioral progress monitoring, and records of supplementary aids and services attempted. If the district cannot produce this documentation, their claim that they've "tried everything" is unsupported. Many districts propose GNETS based on the severity of behavioral incidents without documenting the interventions they attempted to prevent those incidents.

Can I visit the GNETS program before the IEP meeting?

Ask whether you can visit the GNETS program before the IEP meeting. If a visit is available, observe the student-to-staff ratio, the physical environment, the curriculum, and the behavioral management approaches. Take notes. Compare what you see to what the district described. Documented observations from a parent visit can be powerful evidence in a placement dispute.

What's the difference between GNETS and a self-contained classroom at the home school?

A self-contained special education classroom at your child's neighborhood school is less restrictive than a GNETS placement because the child remains on campus with access to nondisabled peers during lunch, recess, specials, and potentially some general education classes. GNETS programs are typically located in separate facilities, removing the child entirely from their home school community. Under the LRE continuum, the district should consider self-contained classrooms, resource rooms, and push-in supports before proposing an off-site placement.

See more Georgia guides →