Can a Dutch School Refuse or Expel a Child with Special Needs?

A Dutch school telling you "we cannot accommodate your child" or "we think your child needs to go somewhere else" is not the end of the conversation — it is the beginning of a legal process that places specific obligations on the school, not on you.

This is what the law actually says, what the school is obligated to do, and where parents have real leverage.

The Zorgplicht: Why "We Can't Support Your Child" Is Not a Dismissal

Under the Passend Onderwijs framework, every mainstream school in the Netherlands carries a Zorgplicht — a statutory duty of care. This duty activates the moment a parent registers a child in writing at the school.

Once activated, the school has a legal window of six weeks (extendable to ten for complex cases) to investigate whether it can meet the child's educational needs. After that investigation, three outcomes are legally permissible:

1. The school provides appropriate support internally, funded through its own resources or additional SWV funding.
2. The school concludes it cannot meet the child's needs, identifies one suitable alternative, and continues its Zorgplicht until the child is safely enrolled there.
3. The school initiates an application for a Toelaatbaarheidsverklaring (TLV) — a formal declaration of admissibility — for a specialized special education setting.

In none of these outcomes is the school permitted to simply send the child home and tell the parents to find another school themselves. The Zorgplicht is not discharged until the child is in an appropriate educational placement. The burden of finding that placement belongs to the school board, not to the parent.

What "Expulsion" Looks Like in Practice

Schools may describe a proposed move in softer language: "we think another environment would suit your child better," "we cannot safely include your child at this time," or "we're applying for a TLV to get your child the help they need." The wording does not remove the school's duty to address the child's placement.

These are not the same as a valid dismissal of your parental rights.

In a removal situation, the school must identify one suitable alternative placement and actively facilitate the transfer. The Zorgplicht continues until the child is safely enrolled; it is not enough to say that no school in the region can help.

The Blank TLV Form Trap

One specific scenario that repeatedly catches expat parents off guard: a school presents a partially completed or entirely blank TLV application form and tells parents to sign it as a procedural formality to "unlock the right help."

Do not sign a blank TLV form.

A TLV — once issued — can be difficult to reverse and can become a significant barrier to mainstream reintegration, but it is not a permanent reclassification. Do not treat an active TLV as definitive proof that a child belongs in the SO track; check the proposed cluster, funding intensity, and placement implications.

Before responding to or signing any TLV documentation, understand exactly which cluster and funding level the form is proposing and what appeal rights you have if you disagree with the determination. The regional TLV route applies to SBO and SO Clusters 3-4; Clusters 1-2 use national admission through specialist institutions.

When a School Says "We're Full"

Schools sometimes claim they cannot admit a SEN child because they lack space or resources — framing it as a capacity issue rather than a refusal based on the child's needs. Under the Zorgplicht, this framing does not remove the school's obligations if you have registered formally in writing.

If you have submitted a written registration and the school is claiming it cannot process your child, escalate immediately to the regional Samenwerkingsverband (SWV). The SWV has oversight of how the Zorgplicht is being implemented across schools in its region.

The International School Exception

Private international schools that receive no state funding are not directly bound by the Zorgplicht in the same way. They can set their own admissions criteria and are not required to offer a special education referral pathway.

Dutch International Schools (DIS) — which receive state subsidies — are fully bound by Passend Onderwijs and the Zorgplicht. If a DIS school is refusing your child or pushing for removal, the same escalation steps apply as with any state school.

Your Escalation Pathway

If a school is attempting to refuse admission, remove your child without finding an alternative, or pressure you into signing TLV documents you do not understand:

First step: Put everything in writing. Send a formal letter to the school acknowledging their position and explicitly stating that you expect them to fulfill their Zorgplicht obligations by providing a specific alternative placement.

Second step: Contact the Ouders & Onderwijs national helpline (088-6050101). They provide free advice on school disputes and can clarify what the school's legal obligations are in your specific situation.

Third step: If the school is actively leaving your child without an educational placement, file a formal melding (notification — not a complaint) with the Onderwijsinspectie (Education Inspectorate), explicitly naming the Zorgplicht violation.

Fourth step: Submit a case to the Geschillencommissie Passend Onderwijs (GPO) — the national disputes committee for special education. Filing is free, no lawyer is required, and the GPO issues an advisory ruling from which a school board may deviate only with heavy, documented justification.

The process is slow, and the consensus culture means direct confrontation often backfires. But the legal framework strongly favors parents who document everything and escalate through the correct channels in the correct sequence.

The Netherlands Special Education Blueprint covers the full dispute escalation pathway in detail — including the specific formal language to use in written communications and how to navigate the Geschillencommissie process as an English-speaking parent.

See more Netherlands guides →